![]() On a pragmatic note, note that this means this previously unhypothesized finding alone is unlikely to be sufficient for publication, as one could make the argument that the strength of evidence for this finding is not particularly strong. ![]() Thus the reader isn't in the dark about your interesting discovery, but also is not misled about the strength of the evidence. In my opinion (as a PhD in statistics, for what that's worth), I'd include unadjusted p-values and confidence intervals, and label them as such "p-value (without adjusting for data exploration): 0.0013". When writing this in your results, it's important to reflect this. My best advice is to be very upfront about the fact thatġ.) You found some relations in your data that were not apart of your original hypotheses you were interested in testing.Ģ.) These results relations were still interesting enough to share, although the evidence should be taken with a grain of salt.īecause these relations were found spuriously, the evidence is not as strong as if they were the original hypotheses of interest.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |